GovLoop - Knowledge Network for Government

I've seen two conflicting stories recently on the security contract with G4S for the Olympics:

 

The first claiming no penalties for underperformance were written into the contract:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/they-left-olympics-hi...

 

And another stating there will be penalties paid after all:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-to-activat...

So here's my question. Why is government contracting so fuzzy in general?

 

Tags: Acquisition, Project Management

Views: 73

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I saw another video where an MP was asking why G4S "still wanted to claim" the management fee.

Why is it a matter of what is "wanted" and not specified in the contract?

RSS

© 2013   Created by GovLoop.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service