GovLoop - Social Network for Government

Dannielle Blumenthal

10 Ways That Social Media Has Empowered Women - And May Save The World, Too

1. Most employers consider it a requirement to know how to use social media—which is basically about chattering all the time about what you’re doing with your friends.

2. People with young children can still participate in the workplace thanks to wireless Internet connectivity and social media collaboration tools that make it possible to get an accredited degree, telecommute, work before the kids go to school and late into the night.

3. Now that this technology is widely available it is becoming “normal” for everyone to balance their work and their personal lives, not just mothers, which means that the work associated with parenting and care of the home is being distributed more equally between women and men.

4. The Internet lets you comparison shop easily and social media means that no vendor is safe from criticism. Thus consumers make decisions based on a variety of factors related to trust and relationships. This is a different kind of business model that gives women, who are traditionally the “communication and relationship experts,” an advantage. (I expect that the genders will increasingly level out in terms of their relationship skills as money is increasingly made in this way.)

5. Social media is a world where physical strength is irrelevant, an advantage for most women.

6. Social media is a world where people can’t be controlled (much) by traditional chains of command. Everybody’s ideas are equal and everybody has a chance to participate in the conversation.

7. Social media-reared kids expect supervisors to interact with them frequently and to mentor them so that they are not just working but growing in terms of their earning capacity. Meaning, they expect to be parented at work—a traditionally female occupation.

8. In the world of social media, you can be slaughtered by gossip. Men, who traditionally are expected to handle physical threats rather than verbal ones, are at a disadvantage compared with women, who are more attuned to aggression that is not physical in nature.

9. We are increasingly incorporating social media collaboration tools into the workplace to facilitate collaboration, because today’s complex knowledge economy requires every employee to be fully engaged intellectually. Traditionally, women as mothers have facilitated family interactions, and this translates neatly into roles that involve online community management.

10. To meet the demands of today’s environment, organizations must function in an integrated way as well as employee employees who are coming to work on all cylinders—physically and emotionally. Everything must be holistic; every part of the machine must work together. Thus everybody must collaborate to improve products and services for the customer. We also must focus on employee engagement and health because without intellectual and emotional capital, our organizations can’t thrive.

Looking at all of this, I wonder what the future will hold, as women and men adapt to this changed world. I foresee that we will adapt to the technology by becoming more balanced people who are better able to relate to one another and to contribute to not only our organizations, but also our world…solving the most difficult and painful problems that humanity faces.

Perhaps the feminist revolution will also bring the end of poverty, illness, warfare, and all the other ills that can be fixed if we just put our heads together and try.

Tags: feminism, social media

Comment

You need to be a member of GovLoop - Social Network for Government to add comments!

Join GovLoop - Social Network for Government

Bryan C Comment by Bryan C on July 22, 2010 at 9:07am
@ Dannielle – very interesting points!

On the flip side, women could potentially be more negatively affected than men by being relegated to an avatar on a social networking site! Like it or not (or rather, whether we choose to admit it or not!), our physical appearance and mannerisms can be just as influential as our words.
Dannielle Blumenthal Comment by Dannielle Blumenthal on July 22, 2010 at 6:28am
That's a good point. Community has historically been empowering to women.

But to answer your question, I think G-d is the cause of female empowerment, and has allowed social media technology to be discovered and to proliferate as a blessing to us.

Re 40 years ago, it was a little less than 20 that I hadn't heard of the Internet and was carrying my baby daughter around the library at CUNY Graduate Center in New York in a Snugli, stacking sociology books in her stroller, and loading them on the subway to get home and write my Ph.D. dissertation. There was no social media and everything had to be done the "shlepping" way.

The only way I could go to class was if I went to school with all my classes on one day and my mother in law watched my daughter from sunrise to sunset. And my father in law drove me to the city for Spanish class. There was no such thing as online learning.

I could go on, but everything I'm saying, I have personally lived and thank G-d many times over for.
Ari Herzog, MPA Comment by Ari Herzog, MPA on July 21, 2010 at 11:46pm
Hold on a second. Not to be the minority responder, but is social media the cause of female empowerment -- or is community?

All of the above points could have been made 40 years ago, no?
GovLoop Comment by GovLoop on July 18, 2010 at 4:37pm
I think #2 is key. People opted out of the workforce (to raise a child, are laid-off, take care of family member) have a way to stay connected and show market knowledge.
Dannielle Blumenthal Comment by Dannielle Blumenthal on July 18, 2010 at 4:29pm
Geez Harlan - you were joking! Thank Gd.

I get your point. Enjoy the day and thanks for the lively discussion!
Harlan Wax Comment by Harlan Wax on July 18, 2010 at 4:05pm
I'd love to continue this but I have to go to the grocery store and do the shopping while my honey gets some rays. Ciao!
Harlan Wax Comment by Harlan Wax on July 18, 2010 at 3:52pm
Holey Moley! Where/when are you living?

First of all the "those feminists" and "our brothers" is a farcial statement in direct response to the bizarre notion of "institutional sexism." But that's my fault for foisting humor into this discussion.

If you want to be literal then let's take the term "our" as we were in discussion that would imply your's and my brothers - or don't you consider "men" your brothers as well?

I never claimed to oppose chauvinism - I don't have the time. If people want to set themselves up as being different I can't fight it. But I will point it out. The only way that is confrontational is if the party feels defensive. Like you said, it's what I observed.

If people want to treat others in violation against the law , well that's a lot easier. But if someone wants to make an issue if I open a door for a woman, if I insist on picking up a box and moving it for an old lady, or if I offer to help a woman with kids in the car fix a flat tire then they better recognize that as courtesy, not gender dependent just the circumstances, and not chauvinism. If you want to call it chivalry that's fine. But don't assume that because I do that it's because I'm chauvinistic. My daughters clean the gutters and walk the dogs, and they bring in the groceries just like my youngest does. And he does his own laundry just like his sisters. We do whatever it takes to get things done because at some point there will be situations where you need to rely completely on yourself.

Her's my reality. Most women I've spoken to and speak with want to stay home and care for the new child and then, as is the case in today's opportunities, many of them want to go back to work and interact with peers and adults. If I said to them, well don;t you do what your husband says and aren;t you supposed to stay at home with the kids - they would laugh in my face or kick me in an appropriate place.

My best friend of 26 years was a stay at home Dad whike his wife worked at the FAA and he managed a home based business, headed up the PTA (three successive years), and raised three kids all in the GT programs with the two oldest getting full rides to William & Mary and GMU. The third is still in high school. My children did not have the same scholastic successes. Shall I make the statement that stay at home Dad's provide a better nuturing and developmental enviroment and oversight than a mother?

There are people and mindsets which are difficult but its necessary to address them individually. It's a garden, not a lawn. Hey look! I didn't use a sports analogy!
Amy Phillips Comment by Amy Phillips on July 18, 2010 at 3:26pm
Great Post, I especially love number 8. Men seemed to be mystified on why it matters who says what, and, in part, I agree with them. But the fact is it does, especially in the blog world where you have to be extra careful not make someone mad.
Dannielle Blumenthal Comment by Dannielle Blumenthal on July 18, 2010 at 3:21pm
The words "those feminists" and "our brothers" say it all.

Last time I checked the feminist movement was about eliminating chauvinism, which you claim to oppose.

I owe my career to the feminist movement and to the women and men who helped me as well.

Institutional sexism is when societ is set up to privilege men or women. Example #1 is when a child is born, the need to provide care is assumed to be a womans responsibility, and childcare is absent from most workplaces.

I respect your right to disagree, but let's stay in reality shall we?
Harlan Wax Comment by Harlan Wax on July 18, 2010 at 3:13pm
chau·vin·ism (shv-nzm) n.

2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind:

What you see depends on what you are looking for.

I see most of your statements fall into the definition above and as we all know it matters not the objective but how it is acheived - the ends do not justify the means

I would be very interested having institutional sexism pointed out to me. We need to stop those feminists from beating down our brothers!

Our company is owned and directed by a woman (trust me she's no figurehead). The makeup of people employed by the company are 66% male, 33 % female, 80% caucasian and 20% minority (by quantity not by weight). 80% are parents and of those 100% are dual income. The entire workforce is over 50 years in age and the majority of people we work with and customers we work for fall in the Gen Y, GenX categories. As contractors we get treated the same by all government clients, and we still do our job enviably well ;-D.

Latest Activity

I vote for #7! Great piece!
20 minutes ago
Simple: I believe in our mission at EPA. In my 17 years here, I've literally helped save the world by working to protect the ozone layer, helped people understand acid rain, and run our response websites for 9/11 and Katrina. And now I lead our enti…
26 minutes ago
Gov 2.0 Radio and Jamith Peterson are now friends
32 minutes ago
Both Government Workers and Federal Contractors network through Web 2 and 3.0 - this group embraces the federal contractor on GovLoop.
52 minutes ago
J Pessima updated their profile
52 minutes ago
GovLoop added 2 photos
1 hour ago
Stephen Peteritas added 2 photos
1 hour ago
Gwynne Kostin added a discussion to the group Music Sharing
We're swinging into the final weekend of summer. Looks like we are safe from the hurricane, so to keep the season going as long as we can, time to list your favorite summer songs. What makes you feel like school's out? What is a song that defined a…
1 hour ago
I.J and Lauri Stevens are now friends
1 hour ago
Adriel Hampton added a blog post
San Francisco's aggressive open data efforts were on display this week, as civic and technology leaders took the stage at sf.govfresh, an event highlighting technology innovation in City government. City CIO Chris Vein (who also was recently intervi…
1 hour ago
I want to have both my votes to go to # 8 good job Kyle
1 hour ago
3 hours ago

© 2010   Created by GovLoop.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service