Getting to the top requires dedication and discipline
In his book,“Outliers: The Story of Success" Malcolm Gladwell talks about the 10,000 hour rule. In short it takes 10,000 hours to get really good at something. If you do a google search on “10,000” and “learning” you will literally pull back 108 million results the first several pages of which (That’s all I looked at. It pays to SEO.) are all dedicated to developing and mastering specific skills. For executives, leaders and anyone interested in their personal performance this may either be daunting or re-assuring.
For example if you are thinking of it in terms of further developing your domain expertise and you are using it 30 hours a week. You can get to this level of mastery in less than 7 years. It is a little more disconcerting though if you think about it in terms of the implications this may have for something that you are only working on for one hour a day. Get ready to spend the next 40 years on the path to mastery.
I am an absolute believer in the fact that real mastery takes time. I don’t know that 10,000 hours is the number, anymore than any other number that would take significant time and effort to reach. I’m also sure that some folks can get there faster than others based on talent and other factors like the complexity of the skill under development. Whatever the number is I think the following five things should be of interest to anyone who is interested in continually improving their performance and attempting to achieve mastery of a particular skill or set of skills:
In conclusion I think the factors above are part of an approach that can help you successfully master specific skills, however I also think it pays to be realistic. Choose things that make sense given your understanding of your talents, the complexity of the skill set and their relative value to you. On the first point I say that recognizing personal limitations is difficult and requires some real soul searching at times. I also think you should be realistic about how complex the skill building effort you are attempting is and set your expectation of the 10,000 hour rule accordingly. The difference between the actual time to a relative level of mastery of something like golf or chess is probably different than something like horseshoes or hopscotch. Finally, I can’t say enough about how important it is to be focused on things that really matter to you both now and in the long term. As I’ve gotten older I’ve really begun to recognize just how valuable time really is and wish I could have back the many hours I dedicated to Sonic the Hedgehog and Solitaire. Maybe if I’d spent that time working on playing the piano like my mom wanted I’d be able to carry off Jingle Bells at the holiday party this year. On second thought maybe Sonic the Hedgehog wasn’t such a bad choice.
Comment
Comment by Gordon Lee Salmon on December 9, 2012 at 11:23am Loved the article. Thanks so much for sharing.
Comment by Henry Brown on November 29, 2012 at 8:24am MIGHT be related; From The Harvard Business Review
Harry - I couldn't agree more with the value of having folks that are focused on having a well rounded body of knowledge to pair with SMEs that are focused on mastering specific subject areas. Mastery is a pretty subjective descriptor anyway. For me the real value in the concept of something like 10,000 hours to mastery is it puts things I should probably should not be wasting time on in perspective, i.e video games, reality TV, etc.
Comment by Henry Brown on November 26, 2012 at 4:24pm Took a significant amount of pride in my 40+years with the government that the best solution for ME was to become a master of none and a jack of all. And to use my leadership/communication skills, which I would like to think were good but definitly not the best, to get the "Masters" on the numerous subjects (IT hardware repair, IT programming, IT administration, IT security analysis amongst others) to support the organization mission as a key players.
I think when most people are younger it is hard to admit that you might not be able to do it all. I know that for myself limiting what I take on has enabled to be more successful in those fewer things. I know that I still often take on too many things but I think I realize when I've over extended myself earlier. Thanks for the feedback.
Comment by Cat Robinson on November 26, 2012 at 9:52am Insightful post. I think a roadblock to mastery in the past for me as been admitting the preciousness of time and the inability to "do it all."Though as I get older I see the value, more and more, of choosing and then following through.
Comment by Andrew Krzmarzick on November 26, 2012 at 9:19am Great advice, Joshua. This post gave me food for thought on where I might want to focus my time. I tend to get going in several directions as there are so many great opportunities to pursue, but there seems to be greater satisfaction in moving toward mastery of something - a stronger sense of accomplishment and contribution.
© 2013 Created by GovLoop.
GovLoop is the "Knowledge Network for Government" - the premier social network connecting over 60,000 federal, state, and local government innovators.
A great resource to connect with peers, share best practices, and find career-building opportunities.
You need to be a member of GovLoop - Knowledge Network for Government to add comments!
Join GovLoop - Knowledge Network for Government