Comment
Comment by Jennifer K. Smith on November 9, 2011 at 1:21pm We're both...centralized office (in the office of the county manager). However, some departments also have their own communications folks. (and we're all dotted line connected)
Overall it works well.
Comment by Nicolette Brennan on November 7, 2011 at 10:20am Small Municipal Government - Cape Girardeau, Mo.
Population 37,000, Annual Operating $47 million
1.5 FTE PIO + miscellaneous related duties assigned City-wide
1. Decentralized - Despite having a full-time PIO for the last 10 years, departments acted on their own on all matters related to communications, branding, advertising, media, etc.
2. This system has not worked well. Each department had branded themselves as a separate entity from the City. Each flyer, ad, radio interview, and webpage was an adventure to a different planet. I've been here two years and I have been pushing more toward a centralized system while retaining department autonomy. We've been slowly developing a consistent branding strategy, training communicators across the organization, and began tracking related data from the management level.
3. Decentralized is far more efficient. How slow would we be if every mass communication, every media touch, etc., had to run through my pipeline (reading Extreme Gov't Makeover, can you tell?) But it is not as effective. We're trying a train-and-monitor approach - giving administrative and other staff city-wide the tools and templates they need to be effective communicators on behalf of the whole.
4. Decentralized = scattered, splintered branding disaster (for us, so we're centralizing a bit)
5. By pushing for centralizing I have made a few friends, and a few enemies. There is a nice way to say " we don't like your clipart posters" and "like it or not, you're part of the City" but it still irritates those who don't see the big picture.
Comment by Erin Wheeler on November 7, 2011 at 8:44am Jina--
These are great yet difficult questions to answer. The strucuture of government communications office largely depends on your the government office's strategic framework/direction (i.e. mission, vision, goals and objectives). The office's strategic framework/direction drives the goals and objectives of the communications office. In turn, the goals and objectives of communications office drive the structure of the communications office because the communications office supports the fulfillment of the government office's strategic direction. I think the better place to begin is identifying best practices and lessons learned in establishing a communications office. This gives you the tools you need to make decisions on how to structure your communications office.
© 2012 Created by GovLoop.
GovLoop is the "Knowledge Network for Government" - the premier social network connecting over 50,000 federal, state, and local government innovators.
A great resource to connect with peers, share best practices, and find career-building opportunities.
You need to be a member of GovLoop - Social Network for Government to add comments!
Join GovLoop - Social Network for Government