The Postal Service has a money problem. A big one. And there aren't simple solutions. The Government Accountability Office has looked at the problem and has made recommendations to Congress.
Frank Todisco is the GAO's Chief Actuary. He told Chris Dorobek on the DorobekINSIDER program what the real issue is for USPS.
"USPS provides retirees health benefits the way the rest of government does. But they are required by law to pre-fund those benefits, which is different," said Todisco, "Right now they have to fund $94 billion but last year they only brought in $65 billion. That means the liability is only about half funded right now."
The GAO Report Focused On:
Why Does USPS Have to Pre-Fund?
Quickness of Pre-Funds?
Right now the pre-funded mandate schedule is broken up into two parts. The current Postal Service bill was signed into law in 2006.
"Payments in the 1st 10 years are much higher. It is a major point of contention," said Todisco.
Concerns
"People are not using the mail as much. Electronic alternatives are taking over. So there is concern that if revenue continues to go down and there is a big unfunded liability, will the money be there to pay for it," said Todisco.
Politics
"Right now they say they don't have the cash to pre-fund any of the alternatives. It's a political and economical sensitive issue. Because if you close post offices or change hours it becomes a very serious political issue," said Todisco.
Views: 214
Tags: DorobekINSIDER, USPS, benefits, budgeting, communications, leadership, pay, postal, service
Comment
Comment by Jay Ach on January 31, 2013 at 3:13pm 1) The Postal Service intentionally was set up to fail via the retiree pre-funding requirement. The Postal Service will need major public support to get a more reasonable plan in place. However,
2) Based on my most recent Post Office counter experience (45215, Lockland, OH; 10 minutes during lunch hour where the line of customers grew out the door while all counter staff were visible in back eating lunch), postal workers just don't care about serving customers. Customers now have alternatives and Postal Service workers had better realize that their employment is no longer guaranteed. No one in that line in Lockland would have objected to firing everyone and bidding the "service" out to a private company.
3) Not only that, but the poor Post Office service reflects poorly on all government workers. The most telling comment overheard while in line at Lockland? "My God, these people are even worse than Congress!"
Comment by Ami Wazlawik on January 27, 2013 at 8:58pm I think we should consider giving postal savings banks, or something similar, a shot. I went to a New America Foundation presentation about postal savings banks last summer. It'd be a good way to generate additional revenue, while ensuring that many unbanked and underbanked folks have access. Here's a summary of the event: http://assets.newamerica.net/blogposts/2012/event_summary_saving_at...
© 2013 Created by GovLoop.
GovLoop is the "Knowledge Network for Government" - the premier social network connecting over 60,000 federal, state, and local government innovators.
A great resource to connect with peers, share best practices, and find career-building opportunities.
You need to be a member of GovLoop - Knowledge Network for Government to add comments!
Join GovLoop - Knowledge Network for Government