…I wasn’t around back then; but if I recall from listening to people who were, wasn’t the Graham, Rudmann, Hollings sequestration much smaller (only half the size?) in terms of percentages?

The current sequestration is predicted to equate to about 9 percent ATB for most agencies; I worry that a cut of such size would force agencies into a RIF situation, especially in personnel-intensive accounts or mission areas; which certainly WOULD have impacts, in some cases fairly severe ones. Do you remember the % # for Graham-Rudmann-Hollings; and if it forced agencies into RIF situations?