Perhaps a bit more practical(or perhaps more realistic approach to attempting to address this issue)
Press Release by Senator Ron Wyden
Udall, Wyden Propose Limiting the Federal Government’s Ability to Collect Vast Amounts of Data on Americans
Legislation Would Require Actual Link to Terrorism or Espionage for the Collection of Americans’ Phone Call Records
Senators Mark Udall and Ron Wyden, who both serve on the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, will introduce legislation that would limit the federal government’s ability to collect data on Americans’ without a demonstrated link to terrorism or espionage. Their legislation follows reports that the federal government has used a “secret interpretation” of the PATRIOT Act, renewed in 2011, to continuously collect data on Americans.
“The NSA’s collection of millions of Americans’ phone call records is the type of overreach I have warned about for years. Although I strongly believe some authorities under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act provide valuable information that helps protect our national security, Americans with no link to terrorism or espionage should not have to worry that their private information is being swept up,” Udall said. “This legislation strikes the right balance in protecting our homeland while also respecting our Constitution and Americans’ widely cherished privacy rights.”
“This legislation will give the government broad authorities to investigate terrorism but will also protect law-abiding Americans from the type of invasive surveillance activities that Senator Udall and I have been warning about for years,” Wyden said. “The disclosures of the last week have made clear to the American people that the law is being interpreted in a way that damages their civil liberties and that the system has been set up to keep Americans unaware of the intrusion. When you combine this proposed bill with legislation introduced to declassify FISA court rulings, we are well on our way to better protecting those liberties and promoting an informed public debate.”