Study: Most Efficient Organizations Grab Random Employees, Promote Them

Home Forums Budgeting Study: Most Efficient Organizations Grab Random Employees, Promote Them

This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by  Steve Ressler 7 years, 4 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #112143

    Bill Brantley
    Participant

    "Want to make your company more efficient? Don't promote people based on
    merit--do it at random. That's the conclusion of a study from Alessandro
    Pluchino and his team at the Universitá di Catania. Pluchino's study is
    one of the winner's of this year's Ig Nobel
    prize, a parody of the Nobel Prize given by the Annals of Improbable
    Research for achievements that 'first make people laugh, and then make
    them think.' "

  • #112153

    Steve Ressler
    Keymaster

    Wow...that's crazy. Pretty interesting though

  • #112151

    Bill Brantley
    Participant

    So, is this more an indictment of workers or our current organizational structures? To me this is proof that instead of blaming the people in the positions that we should look at how we created the positions in the first place.

  • #112149

    Alan L. Greenberg
    Participant

    I hope that "parody" is the key word here. Otherwise this is frightening and in the realm of "Nothing Succeeds Like Failure."

  • #112147

    Peter Sperry
    Participant

    This is no parody and goes to the heart of a dillema that has faced many (most?) executives who understand the Peters Principal. How do you reward performance at middle and lower levels while promoting based on ability to succeed at higher levels? It is not uncommon for executives reviewing their subordinates to recognize they have one or more who while excelling in their current positions, just do not have the vision or personality to do well at the next level. These individuals may be working with (or worse yet supervising) other individuals whose performance in their current position is sub par but who do have what it takes to excell at higher levels. Very few senior executives would want to take a chance on promoting a substandard employee over the head of his or her excellent supervisor; but sometimes that is what would be best for the organization.

    Rewarding excellence without promoting people to their Peters Principle level is very difficult as Peters himself acknoledged in his second book "The Peters Prescription". Among his suggestions:

    Allow people to request demotions back to a more comfortable level with no adverse commentary in their employee record.

    Consider allowing people to bypass some levels if the intermediate level requires skillsets not needed below or above.

    Most importantly (and I am recalling this from reading the book a LONG time ago) clearly identify the skillset required for each position and promote based on skillset match rather than performance at lower levels. Painful for those who are passed over but better than being fired for incompetence at a higher level and ultimately best for the organization.

  • #112145

    Richard Glen Miller
    Participant

    Although my organization is at the bottom for efficiency, they DO seem to randomly promote.
    Another interesting fact is that the idiots they put in management, keep going up the ladder.
    I guess I should rethink doing my best ?

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.