What are the challenges with Gov 2.0 technology adoption?

Home Forums Technology What are the challenges with Gov 2.0 technology adoption?

This topic contains 6 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  Robert Bacal 5 years, 10 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #150992

    Dustin Haisler
    Participant

    In preparation for my next blog post it would be great to hear some of the biggest challenges with adopting Gov 2.0 technologies (Open311, Open Innovation, etc.) tools within government. What are your experiences?

  • #151004

    Robert Bacal
    Participant

    This might be a bit shocking, but having been involved in change initiatives, both as a leader and observer, the BIGGEST challenge is that those involved in leading and implementing the changes (trying to get buyin) don’t LISTEN.

    If you don’t listen to the people who need to buy-in, and I mean really listen, rather than complain, “they don’t get it”, you’ll probably do more damage than good.

  • #151002

    Dustin Haisler
    Participant

    Robert, great point! From my own experience, I’ve seen time and time again that listening is one of the most important skills to have with getting buy-in.

  • #151000

    Procurement rules – It’s hard to use opensource/civic developer tools if the legal roadblocks are put up

  • #150998

    Daniel Bevarly
    Participant

    My response could be voluminous, but I’ll keep it brief and just shed light on the idea. I have been a big proponent that Gov 2.0 and its fraternal twin, Open Government needed a happy medium between data and dialog to be successful. Unfortunately, data has received the most attention and the biggest challenge of the two, dialog, has lessened its importance in this discussion. Data is static. It’s easier to tackle. Dialog is dynamic. And there is a history of challenges surrounding dialog that precedes the web.

    So you stated it appropriately: “technologies.” The main challenge will be government’s ability and effectiveness to provide the required data for those third party facilitators of the public dialog that will return informed verdicts to the policy makers on how to vote on public issues.

  • #150996

    Steve Ressler
    Keymaster

    My experience – it has to clearly solve a problem where the pain is there.

    We could have a debate on definition of Gov 2.0 but I think the most successful ones have that:

    -Open source CMS (Drupal/wordpress) – all agencies need a CMS. Most don’t like their current one and have looked to change them. So change there

    -SaaS email (often Google or Microsoft) – all agencies have email for their staff. Most don’t like their current one as the storage is low and takes a lot of resources. Plus people often have better experiences in personal email accounts. So you’ve seen a lot of adoption of Microsoft cloud email and Google apps for gov

    The ones where it is simply nice to have (we should collaborate more internal for example), I think is just a harder change as no impetus to move tomorrow.

  • #150994

    Logan Kleier
    Participant

    I’d say the biggest challenge is legacy drag, the drag of all the legacy infrastructure and technologies which consumes a high percentage of staff time. This also impacts the organization’s skill profile. It’s hard to move into HTML5, Javascript and anything else more “modern” if a majority of your staff are managing Windows Server 2003, HTML4.0, etc.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.