Why don’t we fix what’s broken?

Home Forums Leadership and Management Why don’t we fix what’s broken?

This topic contains 3 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Dannielle Blumenthal 7 years, 4 months ago.

  • Author
  • #173502

    Hannah Ornell

    I communicated with a GovLoop member about his biggest challenge at work, and he cited that dropping what isn’t working and trying a new strategy is getting his agency down. Do you see this resistance at work too? Sometimes it is just so comfortable to stay with the status quo that change never happens even when it’s needed.

    Is this what’s going on at the federal level with the rise of committees and task forces? To what extent are they made to reassure the public that problems are being addressed versus actually solve our problems?

  • #173508

    The status quo is comfortable in some ways and painful in others. Most people want to fix the problem or problems whenever they become impossible to ignore or work around. However on ship this big you need a lot of commitment from a lot of people over a long period of time. The commitment means you will sacrifice something – up to and including your money (job), power and reputation. The fear of loss is weighed against the potential gain of fixing the problem. That is the reality. When people stand up and say something, try something, take the risk of failure – despite all the potential risks – that is more than courage. It is G-d speaking.

  • #173506

    Shayla Henderson

    I think team work is the binding factor in making these changes. For me, I want to feel comfortable when I am in the loop on changes at work. When my manager involves me with the change, I feel comfortable and integrated — ‘in this together’ kind of mentality.

    For government, I am excited about new committes and tasks forces. I feel such a lack of information from government directly…instead I seek information from resources that aren’t exactly unbias and can contain untrue information (websites, news stations, etc).

    I feel and hope that these new committies and task forces will focus on reeling the everyday citizen in, to educate and excite him/her about being involved in change; team work! Citizens need regular updates (from the government) about what is going on in their goverment, locally and nationally, to feel at ease with problem solving/change. They need to feel connected, involved and informed. As a citizen, I’d like more information directly from my local and national government so I can feel more comfortable about the problems that are being addressed…and from there I can choose to involve myself to solve these problems.

  • #173504

    Ami Wazlawik

    In all aspects of life it seems more comfortable to stick with the status quo than to try to implement any sort of change. People don’t like change, particularly if they don’t see any short term benefit from such change, or if the current behavior/policy benefits them in some positive way. I think committees and task forces are a good idea, but they can turn out to be just what you mention – simply a reassurance to the public, especially if those who are supposed to make decisions cannot come to any sort of consensus (Super Committee, anyone?)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.