I just set up a group on GovLoop called “Government Security Clearances” that I hope can generate interagency discussion about how we as a government grant and uphold clearances to protect sensitive information. Different agencies set different standards for information access and staff conduct and use different resources to conduct background investigations and look into allegations of security breaches. It’s clear that Uncle Sam has a legitimate interest in protecting certain kinds of data and facilities, but the system as it’s currently constituted lends itself to abuse. The problem is that most people don’t focus on that potential (and the unfortunate realities) until they themselves are under a cloud of suspicion. Witness the case of Concerned Foreign Service Officers. Their blog and website have lots of info on the topic, but since many of the group’s members are being investigated by Diplomatic Security (present company excepted, or so I hope!) it is easy to dismiss the very real problems our fragmented security clearance system can create.
Recent Articles on GovLoop
- Agentic AI Brings Greater Situational Awareness to Physical Security
- Preserve Service Continuity, Save Money and Modernize IT at Your Own Speed
- A Resilient Workforce Is Curious and Cross-Skilled
- Beyond Denying Access: Minimizing the Damage From a Cyber Breach
- Feeling Burned Out? Try These Ideas.
- March Into Professional Development
- Get Inspired to Improve Team Motivation
- Improving Decision Velocity With AI-Native PlatformsÂ
- Using Data to Improve Outcomes
- Don’t Fall Into the Security vs. Innovation Trap
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.