Cablegate vs Wikileaks and the new porn

I’ve been trying trying to play around with a graphic to show the difference between the wikileaks driven cablegate and the pentagon papers (ah to live in an era before the suffix gate appeared everywhere).

Here is the best I’ve got so far – would love to hear others suggestions or their own versions.

There is another thing that came over my desk yesterday that showed me how completely backwards parts of the US government has become around dealing with wikileaks. Turns out that the US Airforce has banned access to the New York Times and the Guardian because of wikileaks. Of course the leaked documents and their contents are not just being talked about on these websites… one presumes that banning access to the Internet is what comes next?

The Air Force “routinely blocks Air Force network access to websites hosting inappropriate materials or malware (malicious software) and this includes any website that hosts classified materials and those that are released by WikiLeaks,” she said.

Apparently wikileaks is malware. Or it is porn.

More importantly, the government is telling its employees to blind themselves. That they should pretend like the information about wikleaks, the leaked documents and how the world is reacting to it – the type of information an organization whose mission it is to engage with allies and a public that care about this a great deal – doesn’t exist. If some information is bad… more information must be worse!

The thought control is all kind of Orwellian. It’s also doomed to fail. In the 21st century, information and knowledge is power. Cut yourself off from it and you cut yourself off from your capacity to think and react effectively. In other words the US Airforce has been played. They are doing pretty much what I think wikileaks was trying to accomplish.

Email & Share:

Print
PDF
email
Twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Reddit
Facebook
Netvibes
Technorati
Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
Identi.ca


Original post

Leave a Comment

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Andrew Krzmarzick

Great table, David. What might strengthen it is to use more photos and images. For instance, use the NYT logo and something that represents wikileaks. For key actors, you could have a bunch of folks in suits with (lawyers)underneath along with a corresponding image of Assange. For street vs. online protest…images….you get the picture (pun intended). Feel like this would make it really pop….