,

Twitter as a Focus Group

Imagine, if you will, the packaging on a gallon of Tropicana orange juice.

Now…what did you imagine? A ripe orange with droplets of water? And a straw?

Most likely is my guess.

As you may know, in January of this year, Tropicana had its run in with the scenario Coke faced back in the ’80s when it lauched “New Coke.” Coke changed the classic recipe and the public was outraged. The new campaign was a major flop, and Coke reverted back to its original recipe – Coke Classic (you probably know the story). In this case, with Tropicana, owner PepsiCo rebranded the juice with new packaging. However, immediately following was a clammoring of consumer distress, sending emails such as “Do any of these package-design people actually shop for orange juice?” the writer of one e-mail message asked rhetorically. “Because I do, and the new cartons stink.” Others described the new packaging as “ugly” or “stupid,” and resembling “a generic bargain brand” or a “store brand.”

When the company originally conducted a focus group to predict the success of the new launch, apparently the group lacked one major critical component for establishing a true reading on the liklihood of success: “what we didn’t get was the passion this very loyal small group of consumers have. That wasn’t something that came out in the research” Neil Campbell, president at Tropicana North America in Chicago, part of PepsiCo Americas Beverages.

Now, here’s how Twitter comes in. As I mentioned in an earlier Twitter blog post, in my opinion, one of the best aspects of Twitter is that followers self-select to follow your stream of thoughts. Hence, at least on some marginal level, they care. When a company like PepsiCo rebranded its OJ, there was an outcry. It didn’t take into consideration its best customers, and hence, blew it. If instead, PepsiCo had first gauged customer feedback through Twitter, it would have probably learned of this missed mark far earlier in the lifecycle.

Now, when we consider the movements of Gov 2.0, perhaps this “focus group” capability can be employed in ways currently underutilized…

Of course challenging, but regardless, some food for thought.

Follow me on Twitter –

Leave a Comment

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Profile Photo Allen Sheaprd

Twitter as a focus group.

That is amazing as “brand identification” is sought after in the marketing world. Coke only thought Pepsi had a leg up on them. According to Malcom Gladwell’s book “Blink” the taste test was biased. Pepsi does taste better for a sip but then what people will choose for a sip can be much sweeter than what they choose for a whole drink. A more accurate test would be which soda would they finish.

I wonder if Pepsi Clear would have made it had they used more test markets. There was some backlash at “Its clear carbonated water” but in today’s market it should make it as Pepsi with 0 calories, 0 carbs and will not dull white teeth.

Reply