GSA Contract Expedite Practices Under Congressional Review

I was as speaking with a contact inside the GSA (who will stay anonymous). They let me know that the act of expediting GSA Multiple Award Schedule reviews will soon be reviewed by a Congressional board. While Congress is reviewing this practice, the GSA will maintain the typical GSA Contract expedite strategies inside all Acquisition Centers until a determination is made.

What is a GSA Contract Expedite?

This practice to “knock” a Contractors offer to the front of the line for an expedient review has been utilized for quite a long time. It is not institutionalized among the GSA Acquisition Centers, be that as it may, it is fractured. I have secured numerous expedites for my customers, and I would say there has been no conceivable pattern to when a GSA Contract expedite is sanction or denied. It seems as though the supervisor reviews the details and the expedite is at their discretion. Here are some of the ongoing patterns of the current procedure:

  • There must be sufficient Time for the GSA to review the offer (around 2 months at least)
  • The opportunity must be Upcoming, with strong details on the release and close date
  • The opportunity must be High Priority with a high dollar sum (this is subjective)
  • The Scope must fit into the GSA Schedule (and one or more SINs)
  • The Appeal must originate from a Federal Buyer (CO), not on scouts honor 🙂

Why the GSA Expedites Some Offer Reviews

A contractor gets this extraordinary treatment only if a federal buyer has an upcoming opportunity and solicits that the Contractors GSA Offer be expedited. This results in the Contractor getting the expedite, moving to a quick review, and more often than not they will see their GSA Contract inside 1-3 months (instead of the typical 6+ month review time at present).

It is to the greatest advantage of the GSA to expedite these offer reviews in light of the fact that they will get the Industrial Funding Fee (IFF) which is 0.75% of the dollar sum utilized under the GSA Contract. This IFF reserves the GSA department that oversees the review and upkeep of GSA Contracts. Along these lines, if there is a $10 million opportunity, then the GSA will get $75K from the IFF, which is a mid-range federal representatives yearly pay.

Moreover, the mission of the GSA as an Organization is to serve the Acquisition needs of federal buyers. All in all, the act of speeding up an offer is seemingly simply great Customer Service, correct? Possibly not, lets take a look at the argument against.

GSA Contract Expedites as an Unfair Practice

Congress isn’t attempting to step on the toes of federal buyers with their earnest and high-cost needs. They will assess this practice on the grounds that there have been protests by Contractors who have needed to sit tight longer on their GSA Contract review as an aftereffect of the expedite of other Contractors.

Shouldn’t the Contractors who don’t have an expedite case be given reasonable access to the opportunities? By postponing the review time of one, to give an alternate Contractor “Cuts in Line,” is the GSA (and Federal Acquisition Community as a whole) giving special treatment?

This is a complex inquiry, it is nuanced and distinctive in the case of each match between a Contractor and the unique solutions they offer. To better explain the level of complexity, here are the two extreme cases:

  1. An opportunity can only be satisfied by one Contractor in the whole world. Their offering is a proprietary software that they have created to fit the particular necessities of that Federal organization. The buyer needs deployment ASAP for national security reasons, and they buy through GSA Contracts because of inner policies.
  2. An opportunity could be satisfactorily filled by a substantial pool of contractors, yet the buyer has bought Open Market from a Contractor for quite a long time and trusts them. Recent Policy changes now obligate this buyer to utilize GSA Contracts. The solution is completely generic and the pool of items are all standard among Contractors inside the industry.

As should be obvious, these are two altogether different samples, and the huge question here is WHY the Federal Buyer is asking for the GSA expedite for the Contractor? It could be for a few reasons, yet they have a tendency to fall into three classes:

  1. They are compelled to depend on the Contractor on the grounds that their solution is proprietary.
  2. It bodes well to work with the Contractor (value, superior solution, and so forth.)
  3. The Buyer favors the Contractor (for their own thinking), and needs to limit competition to continue their relationship.

The initial two illustrations are normally sound, however the third is a slippery slope (possibly unlawful), and one that Congress would like to dig into.


Congress will be reviewing this complex practice in the nearing months (or years), to guarantee that this is not mis-utilized, and fairness is practiced among the Federal Acquisition Community. Thus, expect some FAR provisos on GSA Contract expedite practices sooner rather than later.

While the act of offering a GSA Contract expedite can be valuable in serving federal buyers, it could be mis-utilized. The GSA rarely recognizes what the motivations of a buyer are, and the normal practice is to permit front-of-the-line status to Contractors who have a buyer’s solicitation.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply