The Case for Red Tape
If you work for a government agency, you know red tape intimately. It is bureaucracy at its finest.
Red tape gets a bad rap, but it serves a useful purpose. I know it is counter-intuitive, but red tape is meant to make our lives easier and our services more efficient. It comprises all the processes, procedures and policies that will fit most situations, so we don’t have to spend energy trying to recreate the wheel on every case. It frees up time and energy and delivers predictable outcomes.
But sometimes red tape has outlived its usefulness. We need to take a step back every so often to examine if the current red tape is still useful.
Respect Red Tape
Respect means seeking to understand whether or not you agree. Ask around, looking to see if the red tape is a fence around a land mine or a guard rail for a street that no longer exists. Respect is the necessary companion of continuous improvement. Continuous improvement is an attitude that, when applied respectfully, helps you or a group move more efficiently and effectively towards your goals. We serve the public, and red tape is a means to that end. So, we must continuously ask ourselves if the means continue to get us to the ends in the most efficient way. We need to be nimble and grounded; we also need to be flexible about the means and stubborn about the ends.
Interrogate Red Tape
Replace or Reinforce Red Tape
When a specific piece of red tape proves its worth after a respectful interrogation of its value, then reinforce it, don’t demean or cut it. However, if the red tape no longer serves its intended purpose, cut it or replace it from the root. If the practice doesn’t fit the policy, you need to change the policy to fit the practice or reinforce the policy to change the practice.
Tip: A few questions to ask are below before you cut red tape. If the response to any of these questions is some version of, “Because that is how it has always been done,” dig deeper. Even if it is decided that the red tape should stay, at least you understand why.
1. Does this red tape serve a particular purpose?
2. Is it still needed for that purpose or any other?
3. Is there a better way to meet the purpose?
4. What impacts can be expected if it is cut or if it stays?
Interested in becoming a Featured Contributor? Email topics you’re interested in covering for GovLoop to [email protected] And to read more from our Spring 2021 Cohort, here is a full list of every Featured Contributor during this cohort.
Nefertiti is a Supervisory Life Scientist for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). She is passionate about employee engagement, mentoring and helping people and groups achieving their goals. Her leadership mantra is, “Prioritize people. Simplify processes. Celebrate progress.” In her free time, she enjoys reading, drawing and writing. Nefertiti is the mother of a curious and compassionate seven-year-old, with whom she enjoys rediscovering the world.