Every Agency Met Its Target. The Public Is Still Waiting.

Every participating agency reports success. The person seeking assistance has waited weeks for a result. Each organization met its processing target. Each completed its assigned responsibilities. Yet the service journey stalled between them.

The performance system rewards completed tasks while the public waits for a completed outcome.

For senior executives, this exposes a strategic weakness: institutions can optimize their own operations while leaving the performance of the wider delivery system unmanaged. The consequences extend across benefits, licensing, infrastructure, disaster recovery and cross-border services. Wherever outcomes depend on multiple institutions, the intervals between them deserve executive attention.

Find the Time That Disappears From Performance Reports

Consider a hypothetical application requiring three institutional reviews. Each takes two days of active processing. Between reviews, the application waits for acceptance, clarification or confirmation of responsibility. All three organizations can report efficient processing while the applicant experiences a prolonged delay.

Further investment in accelerating individual reviews may produce limited benefit if most elapsed time occurs elsewhere. Executives need a shared view of the journey: when the request begins, when the intended result becomes usable and where time accumulates. Distinguish necessary review from avoidable waiting, repeated work, and unresolved ownership.

The OECD’s Digital Government Outlook 2026 identifies fragmented governance, unclear accountability for cross-cutting journeys, and uneven institutional capabilities as challenges to integrated services. These are executive design issues with direct implications for performance.

Organize Around the Outcome People Need

A new parent, a business seeking permission to operate or a household recovering from a disaster encounters a connected set of needs. Government may distribute responsibility for those needs across several institutions. The OECD’s Serving Citizens 2026 describes approaches organized around life events as a means of moving beyond siloed delivery. Its discussion of Norway’s “New in Norway” initiative illustrates the connection between human-centered design and cross-government cooperation.

The strategic implication is to define the outcome before allocating performance measures. A shared portal may improve access, but institutional processes can remain disconnected behind it. The World Bank’s work on integrated service delivery addresses the reforms and investments required to connect services across organizations.

Put Executive Authority Behind Shared Accountability

A coordinator can identify a stalled transfer. Resolving it may require decisions about resources, policy interpretation, information exchange, or competing priorities. A shared delivery agreement should establish:

• The outcome: What constitutes a usable result for the person or organization?
• The transfer standard: When has the receiving institution accepted responsibility?
• The escalation route: Who can resolve a delay or disagreement?
• The performance view: How will leaders assess the complete journey?

Participating institutions retain their mandates and legal responsibilities. The agreement clarifies how they exercise those responsibilities together. For international services, this must account for jurisdictional differences, lawful information sharing, language and operating calendars. A common outcome requires an explicit understanding of those constraints.

Measure the Experience Hidden by the Average

Average completion times can conceal people facing exceptionally long waits. Executive reviews should examine the range of elapsed times, the oldest unresolved cases, repeated transfers and journeys that applicants abandon or restart. These measures reveal whether improvements reach those encountering the greatest difficulty.

Interpret them alongside accuracy, fairness and service quality. Faster recorded completion provides little value if the person must begin again elsewhere.

The Next Executive Conversation

Choose one consequential outcome that depends on several institutions. Trace a sample of journeys from initial request to usable result. Then ask:

Where does the public’s time accumulate without a corresponding executive owner?

Assign responsibility for addressing that interval and establish a route for resolving barriers. The strongest evidence of collective performance is the result people can actually use and how long they must wait to receive it.

Dr. Rhonda Farrell is a transformation advisor with decades of experience driving impactful change and strategic growth for DoD, IC, Joint, and commercial agencies and organizations. She has a robust background in digital transformation, organizational development, and process improvement, offering a unique perspective that combines technical expertise with a deep understanding of business dynamics. As a strategy and innovation leader, she aligns with CIO, CTO, CDO, CISO, and Chief of Staff initiatives to identify strategic gaps, realign missions, and re-engineer organizations. Based in Baltimore and a proud US Marine Corps veteran, she brings a disciplined, resilient, and mission-focused approach to her work, enabling organizations to pivot and innovate successfully.

Photo Credit: RDNE Stock Project