Through the Grapevine or Twitter?: The Selection of Pope Francis and the Age of Social Media

I bought a newspaper today. I can’t remember the last time I did since I acquire all of my news on the internet. If I had a smartphone, I’m sure I’d be even more up to date, being constantly attached to a plethora of information. But today I picked up a copy of the New York Times because, for the first time ever, there is a Latin American Pope.

Faith aside, millions of people all over the world waited to hear if white smoke was pouring out of the Vatican chimney. But people’s live are busy, so the majority of them didn’t wait by the television. Instead, many simple checked, a site that cuts straight to the point, stating in big bold letters YES or NO. Once the virtual white smoke puffed out of the online chimney, many were directed to various LiveStreams of the exuberant crowds in Rome who awaited the announcement.

Despite my eagerness to hear the cardinal’s choice (this year there were some really interesting candidates), I had to pack up my laptop and get on a train and go to class. Frustrated with the lack of my ability to find out who the pope was instantly when he was announced (I don’t have a smartphone), I asked several people, both at work, at home and my current residence, to keep watch for me and text me as soon as the new pope was named.

Not even 10 minutes after I left, Pope Francis (previously Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio) of Argentina, the first Jesuit and the first Latin American pope was announced. But as I sat on the train I realized something; several people were discussing that there was word that they decided on the new pope, but nobody knew who. They checked their smartphones, but none of the major American news networkshad the announcement, meanwhile my friends and family were following the news via the Guardian, a UK news source and were getting live updates which we retweeted and put on Facebook.

It made me wonder how news travels today. Later in the day I asked a few friends how they had found out. Few of them cited me as their source, and one other laughed about how her Latin American grandfather had texted EVERYONE in her family as soon as it had happened. What struck me most, though, was when my classmate and friend told me that she found out through Facebook, “you know, where you find out about any breaking news these days”.

It cannot be denied that social media is the biggest news source for many people. From natural disasters to celebrity gossip, people spread the word through Twitter, Facebook, and even photo-based sites like Instagram. Social media usually gets the news to individuals first for many reasons; people are constantly checking it, it’s fast, and often it mimics the in-person word of mouth distribution but at lightning speed. In comparison, television is too slow because newscasters and studios have to prepare, while internet news cites can provide quick information once a journalist has taken the time to write an article. Social media takes seconds to update, and often mistakes are forgiven in a misquoted status update or tweet, giving more freedom to news providers to give up to date information without fear of some inaccuracy.

And then there’s the newspaper. I only bought mine because, as an archiving student, I felt that the cover of the New York Times with Pope Francis’ photo should be kept for posterity. Newspapers these days produce news that is considered old, sometimes news that has already been discussed to death before any coherent article can be written. But they do have their place.

During Hurricane Sandy, my parents (residents of New York) were without power for over a week, which included election day. the day after the election, my dad woke up and realized something very strange: He didn’t know who was the President of the United States. Because he lacked access to internet and television, he was forced to go out to buy a newspaper to find out that Obama had been re-elected.

If anything, this papal decision has made me rethink how I acquire information, and how many other people acquire it as well. It has proven how much people rely on the internet for news, but it has also proven that even internet news sources can’t keep up with social media. However, as for Hurricane Sandy, it shows that sometimes an older technology is sometimes the most reliable.

How do you find out about breaking news?

Want More GovLoop Content? Sign Up For Email Updates

Leave a Comment


Leave a Reply

Terrence (Terry) Hill

I’m an avid Twitter user. Speaking of the President and the Pope, both have Twitter accounts. I follow about 150 agencies, news organizations, and thought leaders every day. Can’t live without Twitter and can’t figure out how others can function without using Twitter.

Henry Brown

As far as finding out when the white smoke started, on one of the 2 monitors at my desk was a live feed from CNN of the chimmey. When the smoke came out I moved to the “TV room” where I watched several channels at the same time to find out who the new pope was and shortly after that I posted on Facebook for friends and family the information.

I manage to deal with ~300 Twitter messages a day for “ANOTHER” source of news. Though my primary soruce of news/information is RSS Feeds where I get some 1500 feeds a day. plus the ~40 google+ posts and the ~20 Facebook posts and the ~20 LinkedIn posts

Now that I no longer am required to produce x number of reports weekly, and am not wealthy enough to travel continously,<GRIN> I manage to keep up fairly well on the input on “stuff” that I have some interest in. For the month of Feb I read AND took some action, whether it be further research, further reading, or sharing some 400 different pieces of information.

As far as news gathering, even with all this digital stuff, I still manage to find the time to read the local paper at least 3 days a week and spend 2 or 3 hours a day watching Television.