What You Might Be Overlooking on Your Security Journey
The belief that the government should treat all of its data and services as if they were exposed to the public internet might sound extreme.
The belief that the government should treat all of its data and services as if they were exposed to the public internet might sound extreme.
Zero trust at its best is invisible, meaning it doesn’t create barriers for work but rather enhances the user experience through intentional security practices.
So much of our world, our lives, is controlled by software. The delivery of practically all vital public services hinges on trustworthy software.
At face value, one might not associate words like flexibility and seamless with the term zero-trust architecture. It implies that no one or thing is trusted.
There are a lot of misperceptions and myths about zero-trust security. Here are some of the biggest — and why they’re wrong.
Charged with keeping organizations sage, IT teams have focused on preventing and stopping risks. But zero trust security offers a whole new paradigm, one that recognizes the growing need for collaboration.
Securing IT systems can be a herculean task. The state of Oklahoma found a way to do it: Officials used a zero-trust cybersecurity model.
One of the trickiest parts of implementing zero trust is the cultural shift because it requires stakeholder departments and end users to go through more security layers.
“Words matter. And how we communicate trust — or a lack of trust — to those in our organizations impacts how people react to and receive the cyber practices and processes we’re advocating for.”
Driven by a range of mandates, federal IT leaders are asking themselves how far along they are on the zero trust learning curve.