Orlando’s Approach to Managing Change and Culture
One of the trickiest parts of implementing zero trust is the cultural shift because it requires stakeholder departments and end users to go through more security layers.
One of the trickiest parts of implementing zero trust is the cultural shift because it requires stakeholder departments and end users to go through more security layers.
“Words matter. And how we communicate trust — or a lack of trust — to those in our organizations impacts how people react to and receive the cyber practices and processes we’re advocating for.”
Driven by a range of mandates, federal IT leaders are asking themselves how far along they are on the zero trust learning curve.
Zero trust might not be a cure-all government security, but it’s important to understand how it works and the difference it can make.
Zero trust is a buzzword that’s gaining steam. But in simple terms, this model is enabling remote work and improving user experiences.
“A lot of people get confused about zero trust. It is to some extent a marketing term. Zero trust as a concept is relatively straightforward.”
At the crux of every cybersecurity strategy is an identity data management challenge: How much information does an agency need to verify the identity of an individual requesting access to network resources?
There is no “quick fix” to the government’s cyber challenges, but four recent initiatives could help chart a new course for improving the nation’s cybersecurity.
Many people have either seen too many headlines about attacks, or they still feel embarrassed about falling for last month’s phishing email.
As the distance that networks cover grows, so do the chances of a cybersecurity incident disrupting agencies’ resilience. Cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) can free agencies from this predicament.