Is a Perimeter Security Model Protecting Your Data in 2020?
Agencies have traditionally operated off the assumption that if the perimeter is secure, their data is too. But in a distributed environment, that isn’t necessarily the case.
Agencies have traditionally operated off the assumption that if the perimeter is secure, their data is too. But in a distributed environment, that isn’t necessarily the case.
For scores of agencies, today’s threat landscape can change too fast for their workforces. Threat intelligence adds the context agencies need by focusing on the latest threats in real time.
Even if legacy systems still do the job, modern systems offer so much more. Think about the difference between an old flip phone and a new smartphone.
Responsible for carrying out the election were not just poll workers and election officials, but thousands of IT staffers around the country who defended against cyberattacks.
Zero trust can dramatically elevate agencies’ cyberdefenses from their legacy security architectures. And industry expert shared three ways agencies can stop lateral cyberattacks.
Agencies that don’t speak the same language as their employees and employees that don’t speak the same language as their agency leaders will find themselves constantly fighting cybersecurity fires.
As government agencies move more sensitive workloads to the cloud, they also need to achieve security and compliance requirements.
“There isn’t a big data silver bullet. You have to tie together the infrastructure, systems and security with a flexible analytical framework.”
Agencies can’t protect all systems and data equally. They need to protect things most significant to them through a zero-trust model.
Even with the sudden shift of circumstance, security experts had already foreseen the eventual need for distributed, remotely applied security.